Which of these mythical creatures are more likely to be real?

I'm not saying that they do exist but if one did which one could remain unnoticed by humans?

1)yeti(Himalayas)

2)Bigfoot(north america)

3)Yowie(australia)

4)Ebu gogo(indonesia)



Before answering please take into account the amount of remote wilderness areas in these regions and human influence in these areas.Which of these mythical creatures are more likely to be real?
Well, as someone that actually has gone out in the woods and looked for evidence myself, I scoff at those who suggest we should have a picture or evidence. In fact, I consider myself very lucky because I am convinced that a bigfoot approached my brother and I very close to where the famous film was made. I only heard it but anyway, I only heard it because it approached. If it didn't, I wouldn't even have known about it being there. From Northern California to Southern Alaska, there is a thousand miles of nearly inpenetrable wilderness. If someone thinks it isn't, they haven't really bothered looking. It is true their are logging roads in there as well as some encroachment but that is where the sightings are largely reported.



Yetis are a separate animal from bigfoot. The footprint that Eric Shipton photographed isn't a wolf or anything else. It can only be two things, a hoax or a real print. I think it is likely to be a real print. The stories are very consistent and have been reported since writting began. With bigfoot, there is much more evidence.



Yowie is harder to say because there really isn't very good evidence for it.



Ebu gogo, Sedapa, Orang Pendek are likely all to be the same thing and probably are Homo floresiensis, which is the recent fossil from Indonesia.



The Almasty which may be a group of surviving Neanderthal also seems to be real.Which of these mythical creatures are more likely to be real?
The areas in question are not really remote wilderness and there are plenty of people living nearby. In 2011 everyone has a camera - they come built in to mobile phones - and yet we still have only a few old ambiguous blurry photos from years ago of any of these creatures and no other evidence. If they existed they would have been found by now when you consider the number of people looking for them.Which of these mythical creatures are more likely to be real?
Most likely if they did exist people would have found them by now. However the Himalayas are still pretty remote so I would guess the yeti.
NONE...that's what MYTHICAL means,dear...NOT real.